Products
Reports help you see why competitors are winning and what to change. Local Business is the Maps, reviews, and booking lane. Monitoring keeps you current after the baseline is clear. Custom Systems builds the operating layer when manual work is the real bottleneck.
Default path: Reports first, Local Business only when the leak is local, Monitoring after a baseline exists, and Custom Systems after diagnosis.
Four revenue lanes
Pick the lane based on the pain you need to fix first: lost conversions, local booking leakage, changing competitor moves, or a workflow that is wasting too much time.
One-time product
Use this when revenue feels stuck and you need the clearest next change before spending more time or traffic.
Fixing offer, page, or conversion friction.
Shows what stronger competitors are doing better.
A one-time action plan with proof and priorities.
Local-business lane
Use this when the buyer is a local service business and the real problem is Maps visibility, reviews, nearby competitors, and booking friction.
Owners and operators who care about calls, quotes, and appointments.
Shows why nearby businesses are getting the call first.
A local benchmark tied to Maps, reviews, trust, and booking flow.
Recurring product
Use this when the baseline report already exists and you now need ongoing visibility into competitor changes without repurchasing discovery work.
Teams tracking ongoing market changes after the first report.
Flags pricing, proof, CTA, and launch shifts faster on the existing competitor set.
Recurring recaps, alerts, and escalation when timing matters.
High-touch lane
Use this when the real bottleneck is the workflow itself and the next step is building the operating layer properly.
Teams with a proven workflow or automation bottleneck.
Turns recurring manual work into a working system with handoff.
A scoped build, runtime, and ownership package.
Default path
The main buying path should stay simple. Narrower public offers only matter after one of these lanes is already clearly the right fit.
Use the one-time report first when the team still needs the clearest answer on what competitors are doing better and what to change next.
Use Revenue Leak Validation after the teardown when the team needs analytics, commerce, or CRM data to confirm which leak is real before making bigger changes.
Choose the local lane when the real problem is Maps visibility, review trust, calls, quotes, or appointment flow instead of general conversion strategy.
Recurring monitoring comes after the first benchmark is already clear and the job becomes tracking competitor movement over time.
The high-touch build lane is for operating-layer problems, not for first-pass diagnosis or light product selection.
Special cases
Keep the lane choice simple first. These smaller offers stay visible for buyers who already know they need a tighter scope, but they should not compete with the four main paths above.
Reports
A tighter report for pricing, bundle, positioning, and proof pressure.
Reports
A tighter response package for paid, landing-page, and outbound counter-moves.
Reports
Higher-ticket post-teardown validation that uses client analytics, commerce, and funnel data to confirm which leak is real.
Local Business
The smaller paid proof step for Maps visibility, reviews, and booking friction before the fuller local report.
Local Business
The core local-business diagnosis for nearby competitors, review pressure, and call or booking leakage.
Monitoring
The recurring baseline-monitoring retainer for monthly recap coverage and prioritized visible changes.
Monitoring
The higher-intensity recurring watch for launch-like movement and priority alerts between recaps.
Custom Systems
Recurring listing-launch operating layer that turns listing data and photos into channel-ready launch assets for agents and teams.
Quick compare
If the job is still unclear, this table should narrow the decision without forcing someone into the wrong lane.
How to think about it
Most buyers should start with the fastest valid next step, then move up only when the deeper layer is justified.
The question is: what should we change right now, and is Zendory the right fit for a broader engagement afterward?
The question is: what changed since the last report, and which moves are urgent enough to react to now without rerunning discovery?
The question is: why is the business nearby getting the call, review trust, or booking instead of us?
The question is: how do we build the recurring workflow, signal layer, runtime, or always-on alerting system now that the bottleneck is already obvious?
